| About Us | People | Research | Publications | Training | Resources | Partners |
|
UCLA/RAND
NIMH Center for Research on Quality in Managed Care
Access to Alcohol Treatment and Selective Enrollment in Health Care Plans African Market Place and Culture Fair Analysis of Community Based Participatory Research Scribe Notes CALM: Improving Primary Care Anxiety Outcomes Caring for California's Children (CCC) Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools Caring for California Initiative Creating HealtheVet Informatics Applications for Collaborative Care Community-based Lifestyle Balance Program Enhancing Quality Utilization in Psychosis Evidence-Based Review of Peer Support Family Intervention for Suicidal Youth: Emergency Care Gender and Depression: Treatment, QI and Outcomes Healthcare for Communities Partnership Initiative Implementing Effective, Collaborative Care for Schizophrenia (EQUIP-2) Improving Care for Adolescent Suicide Attempters Improving Care of Veterans by Using Consumers as Mental Health Providers Antipsychotic Drugs: Science, Practice, and Culture (K Award) MacArthur Foundation: Disparities in Mental Health Tracking Grant Mental Health Intervention Program Medical Informatics Network Tool Mental Health and Labor Market Outcomes Mental Health LIP: Implementing Outcome Management Using Patient Self-Assessment Patient-Centered Depression Care in the Public Sector Patients and Clinics Together for Health Patient Self-Assessment System Pathways to Outcomes of Quality Improvement in Depression Quality Improvement in School Mental Health (K Award) Reducing Health Risk Behavior & Improving Health in Adolescent Depression Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youth: A Community Partnership for Suicide Prevention School Environment: Effect on a Suicide Prevention Program Self-Management of Depression and Medical Illness Treating Traumatized Children in a Faith-Based Setting Using Behavioral Science to Explain PCP Depression Care Using Peer Support to Improve Outcomes of People with Severe Mental Illness |
New Directions Evaluation
OBJECTIVES: There is a great need for dual diagnosis (both substance abuse and psychiatric disorders) services in the Los Angeles area. For example, the VA identified 2,500 veterans with dual diagnosis who received medical treatment from 10/1/99 to 9/30/00 in Los Angeles. The New Directions program, located on the VA's West Los Angeles campus, is ideally suited to meet this need, providing dual diagnosis services in their 43-bed North facility. Supported by a SAMHSA grant, this project is an evaluation of this program, measuring progress against the following objectives:
METHODOLOGY: The evaluation of this program uses both qualitative and quantitative techniques and follows a "pre-post" design in which the intervention residents serve as their own controls. After admission, evaluation staff administered the baseline resident survey consisting of measures of symptoms, medication compliance, substance use, quality of life, and functioning. At 6 and 12 months after their baseline resident survey, residents receive an interview that consists of the baseline questionnaire minus items that are required only once, such as demographics. Also, all service delivery staff are responsible for tracking their own residents' services. Each week, staff record the number of resident service contacts on a Service Tracking Form and this information is entered into a resident database. To assess program context, residents and staff completed the Community-Oriented Programs Environment and Program Environment Scales, six months after the start of the evaluation and six months before the end of the evaluation. Two focus groups of a random sample of residents and all providers were conducted on the same timeline to elicit feedback about the New Directions approach. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We have currently concluded baseline enrollment into the evaluation (N= 147) and six-month follow-up (N= 108). We will conclude twelve-month follow-up in June 2006. Preliminary results from the structured interviews indicate that 90.6% of respondents report being housed at the time of their twelve-month follow-up interview, with about half of respondents (54.2%) still housed in some form of residential treatment, while 34.3% of respondents report living on their own in an apartment or house. Respondents show significant improvements in mental health symptoms and functioning at 12-month as compared to baseline but are still more impaired than the general population. In addition, respondents demonstrate significant decreases in overall use of alcohol and illegal drugs from baseline to 12-month, while also showing significant improvements in adherence to psychiatric medication prescriptions--74% took all or most of prescribed psychiatric medication at 12-month, up from 50% at baseline. Regarding employment, while none of the respondents were employed at the time of the baseline interview, 24.2% of respondents were employed at the twelve-month follow-up and 5.2% were enrolled in school or job training. The assessment of program treatment context is also close to completion. The first implementation of the program environment survey and focus groups found considerable discrepancies between residents' and providers' perceptions of the program environment, resulting in a series of recommendations to program administration for organizational changes. The second implementation of the program survey and the focus groups for both staff and residents has been completed and is currently being analyzed to assess what changes have occurred. STATUS: Data collection is nearing completion. Analyses are ongoing. |
Principal Investigator: Sponsored by: |
| Return to the UCLA Health Services Research Center Homepage |
| Copyright 2002. UCLA Health Services Research Center. All Rights Reserved. All contents posted on these pages by the UCLA Health Services Research Center are the property of the UCLA Health Services Research Center. By providing these pages, the UCLA Health Services Research Center is not undertaking any responsibility or liability for any information or publications of third parties on the Internet, even if you access them through our pages. |
Last updated on 8/10/2009 |